However, it is true that you cannot be a successful psychologist of others without first understanding your own mental processes. Therefore, you must study the effect on yourself of the same thing happening under different circumstances. This is because people react differently in different moods and under different circumstances.

You must understand the effect on your game of the resulting irritation, pleasure, confusion, or whatever other form your reaction is. Does it increase your efficiency? If so, go for it, but never give it to your opponent. Does it rob you of concentration? If so, either remove the cause, or if that is not possible, try to ignore it.

Once you have accurately measured your own reaction to conditions, observe your opponents in order to decide their characters. Like temperaments react similarly, and you may judge men of your own sort by yourself. Other characters you must seek to compare with people whose reactions you know.

Someone who can control his/her own mental processes runs an excellent chance of reading those of another for the mind works along definite lines of thought and can be studied. One can only control one’s own mental processes after carefully examining them.

A steady, phlegmatic baseline player is rarely a keen thinker. If he was he would not stay on the baseline. The physical appearance of a player is usually a pretty clear indication of his/her sort of mind. The stolid, easy-going player, who usually advocates the baseline game, does so because he hates to stir up his/her torpid mind to work out a safe strategy of reaching the net.

Then there is the other type of baseline player, who would rather remain on the back of the court while directing an attack intending to disrupt up your game. He is a much more dangerous player, and a deep, keen thinking antagonist. He achieves his/her results by mixing up his/her length and direction and worrying you with the variance of his/her game. He is a good psychologist.

The first type of player mentioned above simply hits the ball with little idea of what he is actually doing, while the latter always has a definite strategy and sticks to it.

If you are fascinated by the psychology of tennis, you ought to go to our website entitled Tennis Tips for Beginners

However, it is also true that you no one can be a successful psychologist of others without first understanding his own psychology. Therefore, you must study the effect on yourself of the same thing happening under various circumstances. This is because people react differently in different moods and under different circumstances.

You have to understand the effect on your game of the resulting irritation, pleasure, confusion, or whatever other form your reaction is. Does it improve your efficiency? If so, go for it, but never give it to your opponent. Does it rob you of concentration? If so, either remove the reason, but if that isn’t possible, try to ignore it.

Once you have correctly judged your own reaction to circumstances, study your opponents in order to determine their characters. Similar characters react similarly, and you can judge men of your own kind by yourself. Other temperaments you must seek to liken with people whose reactions you already know.

Someone who can regulate his/her own mental processes runs an great chance of reading those of someone else for the mind works along definite lines of thought and can be examined. One can only control one’s own mental processes after carefully studying them.

The regular, unemotional baseline player is seldom a keen thinker. If he was, he would not adhere to the baseline. The physical appearance of a player is often a pretty clear indicator of his/her type of mind. The stolid, easy-going player, who usually advocates the baseline strategy, does so because he hates to stir up his/her torpid mind to work out a safe strategy of reaching the net.

Then there is the other sort of baseline player, who would rather remain on the back of the court while directing an attack intending to break up your game. He is a much more dangerous player, and a deep, keen thinking opponent. He achieves his/her results by mixing up his/her length and direction and worrying you with the variety of his/her game. He is a good psychologist.

The first sort of tennis player mentioned above just strikes the ball without much idea of what he is actually up to, while the latter always has a solid, thought-out plan and sticks to it.

If you are interested in the psychology of tennis, you should visit our website called Tennis Tips for Beginners

The really unnerving player is the one who mixes his/her style from back to fore court at the direction of an ever-active mind. This/her is the player to study and learn from. He is a player with a definite intention. A player who has an answer to every problem you present him in your game. He is the most subtle opponent in the world of tennis. He is from the school of Brookes. Second only to him is the player of dogged determination that sets his/her mind on one plan and adheres to it, bitterly, fiercely fighting to the end, with no thought of change.

This is the player whose psychology is rather easy to understand, but whose mental standpoint is hard to derail, because he never permits himself to think about anything but his game. This/her player is your Johnston or your Wilding. I respect the mental capacity of Brookes more, but I admire the tenacity of purpose of Johnston.

Choose your sort from your own mental processes, and then work out your game along the lines most suited to you. When two men are on the same level as regards stroke, strength and equipment, the determining factor in any game is the mental viewpoint. Luck, so-called, is often just seizing the psychological value of a break in the game, and turning it to your own advantage. We hear a great deal about the “shots he has made.” Few understand the importance of the “shots he has missed.”

The science of missing shots is just as vital as that of making them, and at times a miss by an inch is of more value than a return that is killed by your opponent. Let me explain. A player drives you far out of court with an angle-shot. You run hard for it, and having reached it, you smash it hard and fast down the side-line, missing it by an inch. Your opponent is surprised and shaken, knowing that your shot might just as well have gone in as out. He will expect you to attempt it again and he will not take the risk next time. He will try to play the ball, and may make an error. You have thus stolen some of your opponent’s confidence, and increased his/her chance of error, just because of a miss.

If you had merely popped back that ball, and it had been killed, your opponent would have felt increasingly confident of your inability to get the ball out of his/her reach, while you would merely have been winded without result.

Let’s just say that you made the shot down the sideline. It was an apparently impossible get. First it amounts to TWO points in that it took one away from your opponent that should have been his/her and gave you one you ought never to have had. Second it also upsets your opponent, as he feels that he has thrown away a big chance.

The psychology of a tennis match is fascinating, but readily understood. Both men start with equal chances. Once one player establishes a real lead, his/her confidence goes up, while his/her opponent worries, and his/her mental standpoint becomes poor. The sole aim of the first player is to hold his/her lead, thus maintaining his/her confidence.

If the second player draws even or pulls ahead, the inevitable reaction occurs with an even greater contrast in psychology. There is the natural confidence of the leader, but coupled with the great stimulus of having turned a seemingly inevitable defeat into a probable victory. The reverse is the case of the other player, who is apt to lose confidence and play worse. The collapse of his game plan soon follows.

If you are interested in the psychology of tennis, you should go to our website called Tennis Tips for Beginners